GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. MiMo-V2-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10058/10081/10033/10092/100
MiMo-V2-Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder63/10093/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.43/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.87/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.0036/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.7M
9.8K
Completed sessions
29,891,062
8,390
Token share
18.8%
0%
Tokens
181T+100%
0-100%
AUG 15OCT 9
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
57.9%188K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.