Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Omni

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
MiMo-V2-OmniXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	100/100	100/100	58/100	81/100	33/100	92/100
MiMo-V2-Omni	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	78/100	62/100	83/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

DeepSeek

Xiaomi

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text, Image, Audio, Video, Pdf

Output modalities

Text

Providers

DeepSeek

Xiaomi

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.14/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$0.28/ 1M

Cached input

$0.006/ 1M

$0.0028/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

1.7M

12K

Completed sessions

29,891,062

9,078

Token share

18.8%

Tokens

181T+100%

0-100%

AUG 15OCT 9

No trend data

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

57.9%188K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 FlashJamba Mini Nearby alternativeMiMo-V2-Omni vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2-OmniJamba Mini Related comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 FlashJamba Large Related comparisonMiMo-V2-Omni vs Jamba LargeMiMo-V2-OmniJamba Large